Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:TONDAR
Generated Friday 1st of November 2024 02:54:38 PM
Name |
Age |
Party Code |
Criminal Cases |
Education Level |
Movable Assets |
Immovable Assets |
Total Assets |
Total Liabilities |
PAN Given (Y/N) |
Mina Kisan Chavan |
39 |
Indian National Congress |
Yes
6 |
Illiterate |
|
10,05,000 ~ 10 Lacs+ |
|
3,17,000 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
N |
Serious IPC Counts: 12 IPC Details* Habitually dealing in stolen property(413), House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint(452), criminal intimidation(506), Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34), Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object(149), voluntarily causing hurt(323), Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees(427), Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace(504), |
Sarajabai Narayanrao Patil |
68 |
Bhartiya Janata Party |
No
|
Illiterate |
|
33,83,000 ~ 33 Lacs+ |
|
6,30,000 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
N |
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* |
Tejaswini Uttam Bharati |
21 |
Independent/Other |
No
|
Graduate |
|
10,00,000 ~ 10 Lacs+ |
|
0 ~ |
N |
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details* |
*413 Habitually dealing in stolen property , 452 House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint , 506 criminal intimidation , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 149 Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object , 323 voluntarily causing hurt , 427 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees , 504 Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04
Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from TONDAR constituency (PANCHAYAT SAMITI UDAGIR).
Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.