Myneta.info is an open data repository platform of Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).
Myneta Logo Myneta Logo
Home Lok Sabha State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties Electoral Bonds || माय नेता हिंदी में || About MyNeta About ADR ☰
State Assemblies Rajya Sabha Political Parties
1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:GANGAPUR

Generated Thursday 26th of December 2024 02:12:18 PM
Name Age Party Code Criminal Cases Education Level Movable Assets Immovable Assets Total Assets Total Liabilities PAN Given
(Y/N)
Adv Bharat Aasaram Fulare 43 Rashtriya Maratha Party No

Post Graduate 65,00,000
~ 65 Lacs+		 32,30,360
~ 32 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Anil Ashok Chandaliya 44 Vanchit Bahujan Aaghadi No

Graduate 1,85,80,000
~ 1 Crore+		 2,73,10,414
~ 2 Crore+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Anita Ganesh Vaidya 35 Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Party No

10th Pass 80,000
~ 80 Thou+		 0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Avinash Vijay Gaikwad 25 IND No

12th Pass 3,00,000
~ 3 Lacs+		 0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Babasaheb Arjun Gaikwad 52 Jai Hind Jai Bharat Rashtriya Party No

Literate 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Babasaheb Tatyarao Lagad 38 IND No

Graduate 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Bumb Prashant Bansilal 53 BJP Yes

2 		Post Graduate 3,40,00,000
~ 3 Crore+		 4,33,88,533
~ 4 Crore+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 6
IPC Details*
Punishment for criminal breach of trust(406),
Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420),
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.(467),
Forgery for purpose of cheating(468),
Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable under section 467(472),
Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine(474),
Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention(34),
Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B),
Forgery for purpose of harming reputation(469),
Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Chavan Satish Bhanudasrao 62 NCP-Sharadchandra Pawar Yes

1 		Graduate 27,23,94,140
~ 27 Crore+		 3,23,32,967
~ 3 Crore+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B),
Punishment for Defamation(500),
Chavan Satish Tejrao 28 BSP No

12th Pass 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Devidas Ratan Kasbe 59 IND No

10th Pass 0
~ 		0
~ 		N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Dr Sanjayrao Tayde Patil 50 IND No

Graduate 27,00,000
~ 27 Lacs+		 8,00,000
~ 8 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Gorakh Jagannath Ingale 41 IND No

Literate 5,00,000
~ 5 Lacs+		 1,26,642
~ 1 Lacs+		 N
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Kishor Gorakh Pawar 34 IND Yes

1 		8th Pass 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 1
IPC Details*
Punishment for theft(379),
Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment(109),
Pushpa Ashok Jadhav 38 IND No

10th Pass 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Rajendra Aasaram Manjule 46 IND No

10th Pass 60,00,000
~ 60 Lacs+		 45,00,000
~ 45 Lacs+		 Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*
Shivaji Bapurao Thube 40 IND No

Graduate 0
~ 		0
~ 		Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0
IPC Details*

*306 Abetment of suicide , 379 Punishment for theft , 406 Punishment for criminal breach of trust , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 468 Forgery for purpose of cheating , 472 Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable under section 467 , 474 Having possession of document described in Section 466 or 467, knowing it to be forged and intending to use it as genuine , 34 Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention , 109 Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 143 Punishment for Being member of an unlawful assembly , 147 Punishment for Rioting , 428 Mischief by killing or maiming animal of the value of ten rupees , 447 Punishment for criminal trespass , 469 Forgery for purpose of harming reputation , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record , 500 Punishment for Defamation
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from GANGAPUR constituency (AURANGABAD).

Share On:
Download App Follow us on

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs