TIRUKKOYILUR Constituency Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates

1 2 3 4

Comparison Chart of Political Party Candidates of Constituency:TIRUKKOYILUR

Generated Friday 22nd of November 2024 01:14:13 PM

Name	Age	Party Code	Criminal Cases	Education Level	Immovable Assets	Total Assets	Total Liabilities	PAN Given (Y/N)
Arulnehru V	53	IND	No	12th Pass	5,00,000 ~ 5 Lacs+		0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Balasakthi B	37	Pattali Makkal Katchi	No	10th Pass	96,71,240 ~ 96 Lacs+		13,14,000 ~ 13 Lacs+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Dhandapani S	57	BJP	No	Not Given	0 ~	Nil	0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Ganesh G	34	Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar)	No	8th Pass	8,50,000 ~ 8 Lacs+		0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Gothandaraman G	66	AIADMK	No	Graduate Professional	4,22,00,405 ~ 4 Crore+		0 ~	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Palanivel S	30	IND	No	10th Pass	0 ~		97,500 ~ 97 Thou+	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Ponmudy K	65	DMK	Yes 4	Doctorate	5,09,56,535 ~ 5 Crore+		1,63,60,814 ~ 1 Crore+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 7 IPC Details* Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national-integration(153B), Punishment for theft(379), Punishment for criminal breach of trust(406), Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property(420), Forgery of record of court or of public register, etc.(466), Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.(467), Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt, or valuable security(477), When such right extends to causing any harm other than death(101), Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment(109), Punishment of criminal conspiracy(120B), Punishment for cheating by personation(419), Forgery(463), Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record(471),
Rajasekar D	27	Naam Tamilar Katchi	No	Graduate	46,250 ~ 46 Thou+		0 ~	N
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*
Thamilselvi D	39	IND	No	8th Pass	3,50,000 ~ 3 Lacs+		50,000 ~ 50 Thou+	Y
Serious IPC Counts: 0 IPC Details*

*153B Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national-integration , 379 Punishment for theft , 406 Punishment for criminal breach of trust , 420 Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property , 466 Forgery of record of court or of public register, etc. , 467 Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. , 477 Fraudulent cancellation, destruction, etc., of will, authority to adopt, or valuable security , 101 When such right extends to causing any harm other than death , 109 Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment , 120B Punishment of criminal conspiracy , 419 Punishment for cheating by personation , 463 Forgery , 471 Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record
** For more information please visit myneta.info or call 1800 110 440, Web: www.adrindia.org, email: adr@adrindia.org, phone: (011)41654200 to 04

Comparison Chart of candidates of political parties from TIRUKKOYILUR constituency (VILLUPURAM).

Share On:

Download App

Disclaimer: All information on this website has been taken by ADR from the website of the Election Commission of India (https://affidavitarchive.nic.in/) and all the information is available in public domain. ADR does not add or subtract any information, unless the EC changes the data. In particular, no unverified information from any other source is used. While all efforts have been made by ADR to ensure that the information is in keeping with what is available in the ECI website, in case of discrepancy between information provided by ADR through this report, anyone and that given in the ECI website, the information available on the ECI website should be treated as correct and Association for Democratic Reforms and their volunteers are not responsible or liable for any direct, indirect special, or consequential damages, claims, demands, losses of any kind whatsoever, made, claimed, incurred or suffered by any party arising under or relating to the usage of data provided by ADR through this report. It is to be noted that ADR undertakes great care and adopts utmost due diligence in analysing and dissemination of the background information of the candidates furnished by them at the time of elections from the duly self-sworn affidavits submitted with the Election Commission of India. Such information is only aimed at highlighting the growing criminality in politics, increased misuse of money in elections so as to facilitate a system of transparency, accountability and good governance and to enable voters to form an informed choice. Therefore, it is expected that anyone using this report shall undertake due care and utmost precaution while using the data provided by ADR. ADR is not responsible for any mishandling, discrepancy, inability to understand, misinterpretation or manipulation, distortion of the data in such a way so as to benefit or target a particular political party or politician or candidate.

About MyNeta About ADR State Coordinators Contact Terms of Use FAQs