Self Profession:Member of Parliament
Spouse Profession:NA
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Lok Sabha 2019 | Rs15,88,77,063 ~15 Crore+ | 5 |
Loksabha 2014 | Rs9,40,06,549 ~9 Crore+ | 0 |
Lok Sabha 2009 | Rs2,32,74,706 ~2 Crore+ | 0 |
Lok Sabha 2004 | Rs55,38,123 ~55 Lacs+ | 0 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 1,11,85,570 ~ 1 Crore+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 1,07,57,780 ~ 1 Crore+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 86,55,660 ~ 86 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 95,32,710 ~ 95 Lacs+ 2013 - 2014 ** Rs 1,03,76,763 ~ 1 Crore+ |
spouse | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Complaint Case No. 624/SS/2018 | Metropolitan Magistrate 25th Court, Mazgaon Sewree, Mumbai Maharashtra | 499, 500 | Process issued but summons not received yet | No | No | ||||
2 | Complaint Case No. 1698/2018 | Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi Jharkhand | 499, 500 | Shall not be necessary to frame a formal charge u/s 251 Cr.P.C. | No | Yes | The order dated 15.09.2018 passed in Cr. Revisions No. 281/2018 by which the Magistrate was directed to take a fresh look on the materials available on records, after the had dismissed the complaint, was challenged in Cr.M.P. No. 4241/2018 before the honourable High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi and vide order dated 21.01.2019, The honourable High Court was pleased to stay the proceedings in CC No. 1698/2018 | |||
3 | Complaint Case C.R. No. 559/2016 | Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup (Metropolitan, Guwahati, Assam) | 499, 500 | Shall not be necessary to frame a formal charge u/s 251 Cr.P.C. being a summons case substance of accusation read over, Offence explained on 29.09.2016 and plea recored on 05.11.2016 | No | No | ||||
4 | Complaint Case SCC No. 2425/2014 | JMIC, 1st Class Bhiwandi Maharashtra | 499, 500 | Shall not be necessary to frame a formal charge u/s 251 Cr.P.C. being a summons case substance of accusation read over, Offence explained on 29.09.2016 and plea recored on 12.06.2018 | No | Yes | The summoning order dated 11.07.2014 passed by the Ld. JMFC Bhiwandi was challenged before the honourable High Court of Judicature at Bombay vide Criminal Writ Petition No. 4960 of 2014, The honourable High Court was pleased to dismiss the petition vide order dated 15.12.2014, Against the order dated 15.12.2014 an SLP Crl. No. 3794/2015 was filed before the honourable Supreme Court which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 01.09.2016 | |||
5 | Complaint Case No. 25835/2016 | Sh. Samar Vishal, ACMM-II Patiala House Courts, New Delhi | 403, 406, 420, 120B | No | Yes | The summoning order dated 26.06.2014 was challenged before the honourable High Court of Delhi vide Crl. M.C. No. 3332 of 2014. The honourable High Court was pleased to dismiss the petition vide order dated 07.12.2015, Against the order dated 07.12.2015 of SLP Crl. No. 1036 of 2016 was filed before the honourable Supreme Court, which was disposed off vide order dated 12.02.2016, whereby all inferences and conclusions drawn by the High Court, on the various factual aspects in the matter were expunged and liberty was granted to raise all the issues before the trail court | ||||
6 | Criminal Enquiry, CR EN No. 1889/2018 | Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad Gujarat | 499, 500 | Process issued on 08.04.2019 but Summons not received yet | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.