Self Profession:Business Agriculturist
Spouse Profession:House Wife
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Tamil Nadu 2016 | Rs5,67,16,678 ~5 Crore+ | 8 |
Tamil Nadu 2011 | Rs1,84,09,394 ~1 Crore+ | 0 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 34,30,777 ~ 34 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 40,11,020 ~ 40 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 34,30,730 ~ 34 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 28,14,595 ~ 28 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 35,38,907 ~ 35 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 3,75,600 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 3,68,000 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 3,36,000 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 3,36,000 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 2,80,000 ~ 2 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Cr. No. 2675/2020 of Dindigul Town North PS. Dindigul, Dindigul Dist. | Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Dindigul | 143, 269 | Section 3 of ED Act | No | No | ||||
2 | Cr. No. 927/2019 of Dindigul Town North Police Station Dindigul | STC No. 675/2020 | Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Dindigul | 143, 341, 283 | No | No | ||||
3 | Cr. No. 119/2018 of Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul Dist. | J.M. Athoor | 143, 188 | No | No | |||||
4 | Cr. No. 557/2017 of Dindigul Town North PS. Dindigul, Dindigul Dist. | CC No. 604/2017 | Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Dindigul | 143, 188, 341 | No | No | ||||
5 | Cr. No. 253/2017 of Dindigul Town North Police Station, Dindigul, Dist. | STC 663/2019 | Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Dindigul | 143, 188, 341 | No | No | ||||
6 | Cr. No. 179/14, Nilakottai Police Station, Dindigul Dist. | CC No. 159/2015 | Judicial Magistrate, Nilakottai | 189, 290, 504, 505(1)(b) | No | Yes | ||||
7 | Cr. No. 137/2016 of Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul Dist. | J.M. Athoor | 143, 188 | No | No | |||||
8 | Cr. No. 146/2012 of Pattiveeranpatti Police Station, Pattiveeranpatti, Dindigul Dist. | PRC No. 11 of 2013 | Judicial Magistrate Nilakottai | 120B, 447, 379, 420, 434, 304, 109, 104, 511 | Section 4 of TNPPDL Act and Section 3(a), 4(a)(b) r/w 6 Explosives substance Act | No | Yes | |||
9 | Cr. No. 7/11/AC/C C-1 of D.V.A.C Chennai | Old No. CC 25/13 New No. CC No. 14/2019 | Spl. Judge for Trial of Criminal Cases Related to Elected MPs MLAs Chennai | 120B, 420, 109 | Section 13(1)(d) r/w 113(2) Prevention of Corruption Act. | Yes | 12 Sep 2013 | No | ||
10 | Cr. No. 4/2012/AC. CC-1/of D.V. Ac Chennai, Chennai | Old No. CC 19/2013, New No. CC 13/2019 | Special Judge for Trial of Criminal Cases Related Elected Mps MLAs Chennai | 120B, 420, 109 | Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act | Yes | 16 Jul 2013 | Yes | ||
11 | Cr. No. 6/2002 of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Detachment Dindigul | Spl. Case No. 6/2003 | Spl. Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul | 109 | Section 131(1)(e) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act | No | Yes | |||
12 | Cr. No. 1/2012 of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Detachment, Dindigul | Spl. Case No. 1/2013, Transferred Spl. Case No. 27/2014 | Spl. Judge for Trial of Offences under PC Act Cases, Madurai Transferred to Spl. Judge Cum CJM Dindigul | 109 | Section 13(1)(e) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act | No | Yes |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.