Self Profession:Business (General Order Supplier)
Spouse Profession:Business (Knitting and Textile)
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 4,27,580 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 2,71,107 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 2,85,600 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 2,43,500 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 3,28,500 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 5,65,250 ~ 5 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 2,47,890 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 2,65,300 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 2,47,450 ~ 2 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 3,05,000 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 64/18, Dated- 24/04/18 | Corresponding GR Case No. 666/18 | Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate (I), Alipurduar | 341, 379, 323, 506 | No | No | ||||
2 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 19/18, Dated-31/01/18 | Corresponding GR Case No. 177/18 | Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate (I), Alipurduar | 448, 323, 354, 379, 506, 34 | No | No | ||||
3 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 20/18, Dated-31/01/18 | Corresponding GR Case No. 178/18 | Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate (I), Alipurduar | 341, 323, 506 | No | No | ||||
4 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 174/17, Dated-17/10/17 | Corresponding GR Case No. 1982/17 | Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate (I), Alipurduar | 341, 363, 379, 411, 34 | Section 26(1) I.F Act | No | No | |||
5 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 164/17, Dated-08/10/17 | Corresponding GR Case No. 1887/17 | Addl, Chief Judicial Magistrate (I), Alipurduar | 341, 353, 379, 441, 506, 34 | Section 26(I) I.F Act | No | No | |||
6 | Prosecutlon Offence Report 34/HTG of 2015-16, Date- 31/07/15, vide memo 323/HTG/15 | Corresponding CR Case No. 419/15 | Judicial Magistrate 2nd Court, Alipurduar | Section 42 Indian Forest Act. Read with 11 west Bengal forest produce transit Rules 1959 | No | No | ||||
7 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 148/15, Date- 30/07/15 | Corresponding GR Case No. 2260/15 | Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Alipurduar | 341, 186, 353, 325, 506, 34 | No | No | ||||
8 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 60/12, Date- 24/03/12 | Corresponding GR Case No. 653/12 | Judicial Magistrate 3rd Court, Alipurduar | 341, 332, 353, 186, 506, 34 | Yes | 29 Nov 2013 | No | |||
9 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 104/09, Date- 31/05/09 | Corresponding GR Case No. 1212/09 | Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Alipurduar | 448, 323, 354, 379, 506, 34 | Yes | 16 Mar 2020 | No | |||
10 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 505/08, Date- 30/12/2008 | Corresponding GR Case No. 118/19 | Judicial Magistrate 1st Court, Alipurduar | 385, 506, 427 | Yes | 15 Sep 2017 | No | |||
11 | Kalchini Police Station Case No. 288/08, Date-04/07/08 | Corresponding GR Case No. 2856/08 | Judicial Magistrate 2nd Court, Alipurduar | 341, 448, 353, 506, 427 | Yes | 13 Aug 2012 | No | |||
12 | Offence report No. 6/MPP-2008-2009, Date- 03/04/08 | Corresponding to CR No.104/08 | Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cooch Behar | Section 41/42 I.F Act WB Amendment Act 1988, Rule 4 & 11 of the West Bengal Forest Produce transit rules 1959 read with Section 3 PDPP Act 1984 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.