Self Profession:Agriculture & Advocate
Spouse Profession:Agriculture & Business
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2013 - 2014 | Rs 40,12,268 ~ 40 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2013 - 2014 | Rs 23,60,841 ~ 23 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | Y | 2013 - 2014 | Rs 9,17,252 ~ 9 Lacs+ |
dependent2 | Y | 2013 - 2014 | Rs 12,09,828 ~ 12 Lacs+ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | Sec. 1985 Bihar Property Deformation Act, Mufsil Aurangabad P.S.Case No.-198/2010, Court taking Cognizance-Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, GR.No.2215/10, TR.No.1166/15, Cognizance Date-18/01/2011, Court which framed the Charges-Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, Charge Framed Date-25/1/2012 | ||
2 | 171H, 188 | Nagar P.S.Aurangabad, Case No.450/2010, Court taking Cognizance-Gorakhnath Dubey, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, GR.No.2173/10, TR.No.58/15, Cog. Date-9/2/2011, Court which framed the Charges-Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, Charge Framed Date-25/1/2012 | |
3 | 171H, 188, 34 | Dev P.S. Case No.97/2010, Court taking Cognizance-Umesh Ram, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, GR.No.2159/10, TR.No.517/15, Cog. Date-15/3/2011, Court which framed the Charges-Ashutosh Khetan, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, Charge Framed Date-15/4/2013 | |
4 | 379 | Sec. 4/40 Bihar Mines Minerals Act, Mufsil P.S. Rohtas Case No.340/2002, Court taking Cognizance-Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, GR.No.1333/2002, TR.No.487/2010, Cognizance Date-16/9/2002, Court which framed the Charges-Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Charge Framed Date-3/4/2005 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 409, 420, 120B, 34 | Sisai P.S.Case No.59/2001, Court taking Cognizance-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla,GR.No.479/2001, Cog. Date-23/5/2008, Appeal Pending in High Court Ranchi, Criminal Mis.Case No.1058/08 | |
2 | 171H, 188 | Nagar P.S.Aurangabad, Case No.452/2010, Court taking Cognizance-Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, GR.No.2175/10, TR.No.1159/15, Cog. Date-15/1/2011 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.