Self Profession:Social Worker
Spouse Profession:Business Woman
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2018 - 2019 | 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 4,84,892 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 4,69,366 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 4,36,714 ~ 4 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 3,90,955 ~ 3 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 6,24,701 ~ 6 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2018 - 2019 | 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 8,14,951 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 8,08,618 ~ 8 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 7,85,040 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 7,84,307 ~ 7 Lacs+ 2014 - 2015 ** Rs 5,73,221 ~ 5 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 0430/2016 Police Station Farsh Bazar, Dist. East Delhi | 323, 341, 506, 34 | No | No |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 84/II/97 | Shri Dhirendra Rana, MM-02 West Delhi, Tis Hazari Court | 186, 332, 353, 34 | U/s 186-SI of One Month and fine of Rs. 200 each, ID SI for 7 days, U/s 332-SI for 3 months and fine Rs. 500 each, ID SI for 10 days, U/s 353 IPC- SI for 3 months and fine Rs. 1500 each, ID SI for 10 days | 20 Oct 2015 | Yes | The appeal was partly allowed vide order dated 02.06.2017 and order on sentenced dated 17.07.2017 in Criminal Appeal no. 54213 of 2016 by the Honorable Court of ms. Smita Garg, ASJ (FTC)- West, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi and the deponent was released on probation of good conduct for a period of one year on furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10000 with surety |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.