Self Profession:Businessman
Spouse Profession:House Wife
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Goa 2012 | Rs2,11,94,938 ~2 Crore+ | 1 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 4,31,996 ~ 4 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 4,31,996 ~ 4 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 143, 341, 149 | Section 174(a) of Railways Act, Criminal Case No. 5/S/2007/B, Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vasco Da Gama Goa, Dated 30.11.2007, Punished for wrongfully detaining the train at Railway Station, Vasco Da Gama Goa, Punishment imposed- Release on admonition under Section 3 of Probation of offernders Act 1958 by giving warning at the time of pronouncing the judgement and order | |
2 | Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, Criminal Case No. OA/285/2012/B, Judicial Magistrate First Class at Panjai Goa, Dated 16.01.2015, Punished for dishonor of cheque, Punishment imposed- Sentenced to undergo simple Imprisonment of 3 months, Any appeal- The order passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class Panaji was modified and stands varied in Appeal No. 17/2015 before the District and Session Court at Panaji and directed to pay an amount of Rs.25000/- to the District Legal Services Authority which was accordingly paid |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.