Self Profession:FARMER/ SOCIAL WORKER
Spouse Profession:FARMER/SOCIAL WORKER
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | None | Rs 0 ~ |
spouse | Y | 2010 - 2011 | Rs 9,56,230 ~ 9 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 322, 323, 501, 506(2), 114 | FIR NO. 22/91, DATE.01.02.1991 AT THE JAMKANDORNA PS (DIST RAJKOT) (CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION, DEATH THREATS). CASES PENDING IN THE DHORAJI MAGISTRAT'S COURT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 26.04.1991 | |
2 | 323, 324, 504, 506(2), 189 | FIR NO,123/91, DATE 21.09.1991 AT THE JAMKANDORNA PS DIST RAJKOT THREATING PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY CRIMINAL MINILATION DEATH THREATS AND ASTROCITIES ACT A-1(10) CASE PENDING IN THE DHORAJI MAGISTRAT'S COURT JUDICIAL MEGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 01.04.1991 | |
3 | 504, 506(2) | FIR NO.111/92 DATE 04.11.1992, AT THE JAMKANDORNA PS DIST RAJKOT CRIMINAL MINILATION CRIMINAL ASSOULT CASE PENDING IN THE DHORAJI MAGISTRATS COURT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 20.11.1992 | |
4 | 188 | DISTURBING PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY AND BOMBAY PUBLIC ACT SECTION 33(1), (2), (33), CASES PENDING AT THE DHORAJI MAGISTRATES COUORT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 27.09.2002 | |
5 | 189, 504, 506(2) | FIR NO,3058/98 DATE 15.06.1998, AT DHORAJI PS DIST RAJKOT DISTURBING PUBLIC SERVANT INJURY CRIMINAL MINILATION DEATH THREATS CASE PENDING AT THE DHORAJI MAGISTRATE COURT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 03.01.1999 | |
6 | 188 | FIR NO.3018/98, DATE 21.02.1998, UNDER 135 BOMBAY POLICE ACT, (DISOBEYING PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY) CASE PENDING IN THE COURT OF DHORAJI MAGISTRATES COURT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 23.04.1998 | |
7 | 188 | FIR NO, 3019/98 DATE 21.02.1998, UNDER 135 BOMBAY POLICE ACT (DISOVEYING PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY) CASE PENDING IN THE COURT OF DHORAJI MAGISTRATES COURT JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS SINCE 23.04.1998 | |
8 | 332, 143, 149, 504, 341 | FIR NO.57/02 DATE 25.01.2002 AT POLICE STATION RAJKOT CITY , HERREST PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY WRONGFUL STATEMENT, CASE PENDING IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, RAJKOT CITY SINCE 10.03.2002 | |
9 | 186, 387, 504, 506(2), 188, 114 | FIR NO,742/02 DATE 23.11.2000, AT POLICE STATION RAJKOT CITY, TO DAMAGE PUBLIC PROPERTY AND DEATH THREATS ETC, CASE PENDING IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS, RAJKOT CITY SINCE 10.03.2002 | |
10 | 186, 304, 477, 114 | FIR NO,223/2000 DATE 17.04.2000 AT POLICE STATION RAJKOT CITY , THREATS ASSULT OF SENIOR GOVT OFFICERS DESTRICTION OF EVIDENCE, CASE PENDING IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS RAJKOT CITY SINCE 04.07.2000 | |
11 | 504, 506(2), 188 | ARMS ACT 30 CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION DEATH TIEA (S) CASE PENDING BEFORE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT DHORAJI SINCE 22.02.06, FIR NO. 3194/05 DATE 26.05.2005 AT DHORAJI POLICE STATION DIST RAJKOT | |
12 | 504, 506(2) | UNDER SEC. 135 B.P. ACT, CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION DEATH THREATS CASE PENDING BEFORE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES COURT DHORAJI SINCE 22.07.2005, FIR NO, 9704/05 DATE 28.12.2004 AT DHORAJI POLICE STATION DIST RAJKOT | |
13 | 143, 147, 149, 186, 188 | DAMEGE TO PUBLIC PROPERT ETC FIR NO, 1-555/08 AT 04.12.08 AT RAJKOT CITY PRADUMAN NAGAR POLICE ST. CASE PENDING BEFORE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAG. RAJKOT COURT NO. 4 SINCE 19.01.2009 | |
14 | 143, 147, 149, 188, 152, 353, 332, 429 | RIOTING CRIMINAL ASSULT OF PUBLIC SERVANT ON DUTY, FIR NO. 8309 AT 28.08.2009 AT JETPUR POLICE STATION DIST RAJKOT. CASE PENDING AT JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATES COURT JETPUR DIST RAJKOT VIDE CR. CASE NO.154-2010. | |
15 | 323, 341, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506(2) | 25(1) ARMS ACT, FIR NO.166/122 AT 12.10.2012, KARJAN POLICE STATION DIST BARODA. CRIMINAL ASSULT & TO THREAT FOR DEATH THIS MATTER PENDING IN HON. GUJARAT HIGH COURT VIDE CRIMINAL MISC, APPLICATION NO.15281 OF 2012 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.