Self Profession:Farming & Tourisum
Spouse Profession:Social Worker
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
spouse | Y | 2019 - 2020 | 2019 - 2020 ** Rs 6,75,933 ~ 6 Lacs+ 2018 - 2019 ** Rs 16,67,447 ~ 16 Lacs+ 2017 - 2018 ** Rs 11,70,563 ~ 11 Lacs+ 2016 - 2017 ** Rs 12,61,328 ~ 12 Lacs+ 2015 - 2016 ** Rs 5,33,814 ~ 5 Lacs+ |
huf | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent1 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ None ** Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | FIR No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Charges Framed | Date on which charges were framed | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal |
---------No Cases-------- |
Serial No. | Case No. | Court | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | Punishment Imposed | Date on which convicted | Appeal Filed | Details and present status of appeal | |
1 | 2212/2016 | JMIC, Rohtak | Sec.138 Negotiable Instrument Act | The cheque amount in the instant case is Rs.520500/-, The complaint was filed on 28/11/2016. If adequate compensation is not given to the complainant, it will defeat the very object of section 138 of the Act. Therefore, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice would meet if convict is sentenced with fine of Rs.620000/- which includes interest at the rate of 6% P.A. on the cheque amount w.e.f. 17/10/2016, the date of issuance of cheque Rs.85899/- and 8000/- litigation expenses and 5601/- court fine. In addition to this, convict Joginder Singh shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year three months. Out of the total fine amount Rs.614399/- shall be paid to the complainant as compensation under section 357(1)Cr.P.C. and 5601/- shall be deposited as fine with the court. In case of non payment of the fine. convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months which shall be in addition to the substantive sentence. Fine not paid | 11 Jun 2019 | Yes | Appeal Pending vide Appeal Nos.CRA-114, Sessions Court, Rohtak, Pending | ||
2 | 2213 of 2016 | JMIC, Rohtak | Sec.138 Negotiable Instrument Act | The cheque amount in the instant case is Rs.531000/- The complaint was filed on 28/11/2016. If adequate compensation is not given. to the complainant, it will defeat the very object of Section 138 of the Act. Therefore, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice would meet if convict is sentenced with fine of Rs.630000/- which includes interest at the rate of 6% p.a. on the cheque amount w.e.f. 17/10/2016, the date of issuance of cheque (Rs.87615) and Rs.8000/- litigation expenses and 3385/- court fine. In addition to this, convict Joginder Singh shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year three months. Out of the total fine amount Rs.626615/- shall be paid to the complainant as compensation under section 357(1) Cr.P.C. and Rs.3385/- shall be deposited as fine with the court. In Case of non payment of the fine, convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months which shall be in addition to the substantive sentence, Fine not paid | 11 Jun 2019 | Yes | Appeal Pending vide Appeal No.CRA-145, Sessions Court, Rohtak, Pending | ||
3 | 2214 of 2016 | JMIC, Rohtak | Sec.138 Negotiable Instrument Act | The cheque amount in the instant case is Rs.289800/-. The complaint was filed on 28/11/2016. If adequate compensation is not given to the complainant, it will defeat the very object of section 138 of the Act. Therefore, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice would meet if convict is sentenced with fine of Rs.350000/- which includes interest at the rate of 6% P.A. on the cheque amount w.e.f. 17/10/2016, the date of issuance of cheque (Rs.47817/-) and 8000/-litigation expenses and Rs.4383/- court fine. In addition to this, convict Joginder Singh shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year. Out of the total fine amount Rs.345617/-Shall be paid to the complainant as compensation. Under section 357(1)Cr.P.C. and Rs.4383/- shall be deposited as fine with the court. In case of non payment of the fine, convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months which shall be in addition to the substantive sentence. Fine not paid | 11 Jun 2019 | Yes | Appeal Pending vide Appeal No.CRA-146, Sessions Court, Rohtak, Pending | ||
4 | 2215 of 2016 | JMIC, Rohtak | Sec.138 Negotiable Instrument Act | The cheque amount in the instant case is Rs.512050/-. The complaint was filed on 28/11/2016. If adequate compensation is not given to the complainant, it will defeat the very object of section 138 of the Act. Therefore, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice would meet if convict is sentenced with fine of Rs.610000/- which includes interest at the rate of 6% P.A. on the cheque amount w.e.f. 17/10/2016, the date of issuance of cheque (Rs.84513/-) and 8000/-litigation expenses and Rs.5437/- court fine. In addition to this, convict Joginder Singh shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year three months. Out of the total fine amount Rs.604563/-Shall be paid to the complainant as compensation. Under section 357(1)Cr.P.C. and Rs.5437/- shall be deposited as fine with the court. In case of non payment of the fine, convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months which shall be in addition to the substantive sentence. Fine not paid | 11 Jun 2019 | Yes | Appeal Pending vide Appeal No. CRA-147, Sessinos Court, Rohtak, Pending | ||
5 | 2216 of 2016 | JMIC, Rohtak | Sec.138 Negotiable Instrument Act | The cheque amount in the instant case is Rs.517440/-. The complaint was filed on 28/11/2016. If adequate compensation is not given to the complainant, it will defeat the very object of section 138 of the Act. Therefore, this court is of the considered view that ends of justice would meet if convict is sentenced with fine of Rs.615000/- which includes interest at the rate of 6% P.A. on the cheque amount w.e.f. 17/10/2016, the date of issuance of cheque (Rs.85404/-) and 8000/-litigation expenses and Rs.4156/- court fine. In addition to this, convict Joginder Singh shall undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year three months. Out of the total fine amount Rs.604563/-Shall be paid to the complainant as compensation. Under section 357(1)Cr.P.C. and Rs.4156/- shall be deposited as fine with the court. In case of non payment of the fine, convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months which shall be in addition to the substantive sentence. Fine not paid | 11 Jun 2019 | Yes | Appeal Pending vide Appeal Nos. CRA-147, Sessions Court, Rohtak, Pending |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit Information
|
|
|
Disclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.