Self Profession:Agriculture
Spouse Profession:House wife
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Nil | ||
spouse | Nil | ||
dependent1 | Nil | ||
dependent2 | Nil | ||
dependent3 | Nil |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 | ST. No. 152/12 Kuchai, 27 Arms Act., 7 CLA Act., Court Taking Cong- CJM, Date of Cong. 2/08/2012, Court Which Charges Framed- ADJ-1, Date of Charges Framed : 19/01/2013 | |
2 | 364, 302, 34 | 27 Arms Act. 7 CLA Act. PS. S.T. No. 154/12 Chowka, Court taken cong. CJM, Date of cong. 10/12/08, Court which charges framed : 20/03/2013, | |
3 | 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 | 27 Arms Act., 7 CLA Act. S.T. 180/12 Court Taken Cong- CJM, Date of Cong- 8/08/2013, Cout which charges Framed- ADJ-2, Date of charges framed : 8/8/2013 | |
4 | 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 | 27, 25 (1-b)a 26/35 Arms Act., ST 168/12, Court taken Cong. SDJM, Date of Cong. 4/03/2013, Court which charges framed : ADJ-2, Date of Charges framed : 4/03/2013 | |
5 | 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 | 27 Arms & 7 CLA Act, S.T. No. 193/12, Court taken cong- CJM, Date of Cong- 22/11/2013, Court which charge framed- ADJ-2, Date of charges framed- 22/11/2013 | |
6 | 341, 323, 307, 34 | 27 Arms Act., ST No. 6/12, Court taken cong. CJM, Date of cong. 16.03.13, Court which charges framed : ADJ-2, Date of Charges framed : 8/08/2013 | |
7 | S.T. No. 169/12, Court which taken cong.CJM, Date of cong. 2/2/2013, Date of charges framed : ADJ-1, Date of charges framed : 02/02/2013 | ||
8 | G.R. No. 687/11 Chowka P.S. Dist. Sarai Kela Kharsawan, Court which Cong. SDJM Saraikela, Date of Cong. 8/11/11, Court which charges framed : SDJM Saraikela, Date of charges framed : 22/02/2012 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 353, 307, 341 | 27 Arms & 7 CLA Act., CJM ST. No. 138/11, Dt. 24.06.2011 | |
2 | 147, 148, 149, 353, 302, 307, | 25(1-b)a 26, 27, 35 Arms Act, & 7 CLA Act, CJM ST No. 166/12 Dt. 20.10.2011, | |
3 | 326, 307, 341 | S.T. No. 197/12, Dt. 10.08.2011, 3,4,5 Excise Act. |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.