Self Profession:Parthvi Dairy Product
Spouse Profession:Rohin Developers
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Rajasthan 2023 | Rs7,91,48,704 ~7 Crore+ | 9 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | Rs 10,01,516 ~ 10 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | Rs 3,07,806 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 452, 323, 324, 325, 147 | FIR No. 355/1997, Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu, Case No. 297/2005, 216/2018, Court Name:- ACJM Jhunjhunu, Date of charge framed 06.08.2008 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 174A | FIR No. 422/2007, Police Station Mansarovar Jaipur, Court Name:- Judicial Magistrate Jaipur, Case No. 3002/2010 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 147 | Case No. 31/94, Court Name- CJM Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 30.01.1999 | |
2 | Section 3/25 Arms Act, Case No. 310/1996, Court Name- ACJM Rajgarh (Churu), Date of Conviction 19.11.2004, Fine Rs. 800/- | ||
3 | 147, 323 | Case No. 201/98, Court Name- CJM Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 20.08.2001, Fine Rs. 200/- | |
4 | 147, 323, 341 | Case No. 10/99, Court Name- MJM Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 31.03.2003, Fine Rs. 300/- | |
5 | 147, 148, 365, 149 | Case No. 367/97 (379/01), Court Name- ACJM Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 24.01.2004 | |
6 | 323, 149, 148 | Case No. 10/04 (58/01), Court Name- ADJ Fast Track No. 3 Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 30.06.2004, 1 Year Simple imprisonment & Rs. 500/- fine for 323/149 IPC, 3 Years simple imprisonment & Rs. 1500/- fine for 148 IPC, Appeal details- Rajasthan High Court Appeal No. 754/2004, Appeal pending | |
7 | 174A | Case No. 302/10, Court Name- Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act) No. 2 Jaipur, Date of Conviction 20.10.2010, Appeal details- Additional Session Judge No. 17 Jaipur Petition No. 2483/2018, Hearing Date 01.12.2018 | |
8 | 452, 323, 324, 325, 147 | Case No. 297/05 (216/18), Court Name- ACJM Jhunjhunu, Date of Conviction 06.07.2017, Rs. 2000/- Fine, Appeal details- Session Judge Jhunjhunu, No 1449/2018, Case Pending in Rajasthan High Court Jaipur |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.