Self Profession:Business
Spouse Profession:Business
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2017 - 2018 | Rs 3,53,710 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2017 - 2018 | Rs 3,55,620 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 143, 447, 427, 379 | PS. Balotra FIR No. 374/2006, Case No. 431/2007, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Framed Date 30.08.2012 | |
2 | 143, 447, 427, 379 | PS. Balotra FIR No. 372/2006, Case No. 429/2007, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Balotra, Framed Date 30.08.2012 | |
3 | 143, 447, 427, 379 | PS. Balotra FIR No. 371/2006, Case No. 428/2007, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Framed Date 30.08.2012 | |
4 | 143, 447, 427, 379 | PS. Balotra FIR No. 373/2006, Case No. 430/2007, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Framed Date 30.08.2012 | |
5 | Sec. 13 RPGO Act, PS. Balotra FIR No. 89/2014, Case No. 268/2015, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Framed Date 24.07.2014 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 143, 447, 427 | PS. Balotra FIR No. 97/2013, Case No. 481/2017, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 323, 341 | Case No. 859/2009, Court Name- Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Date of orders of conviction 24.04.2010, Punishment Imposed Rs. 250/- Fine | |
2 | 323, 341 | Case No. 327/2009, Court Name- Judicial Magistrate, Balotra, Date of orders of conviction 23.10.2010, Punishment Imposed Rs. 100/- Fine | |
3 | Sec. 13 RPGO Act, Case No. 622/2016, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Date of orders of conviction 20.12.2016, Punishment Imposed Rs. 100/- Fine | ||
4 | 279 | Case No. 244/2011, Court Name- Mobile Magistrate Court Mahanagar Jodhpur, Date of orders of conviction 04.11.2011, Punishment Imposed Rs. 1000/- Fine | |
5 | Sec. 13 RPGO Act, Case No. 49/2015, Court Name- Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Balotra, Date of orders of conviction 09.02.2015, Punishment Imposed Rs. 100/- Fine |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.