Self Profession:Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India
Spouse Profession:Ghazal and Sufi Singer
Assets: | Rs 18,72,32,49,466 ~1872 Crore+ |
Liabilities: | Rs 20,11,99,850 ~20 Crore+ |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2022 - 2023 | Rs 3,59,56,87,560 ~ 359 Crore+ |
spouse | Y | 2022 - 2023 | Rs 11,00,06,300 ~ 11 Crore+ |
dependent1 | Y | 2022 - 2023 | Rs 10,607 ~ 10 Thou+ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 420 | Since this is a Criminal Complaint Filed by the Income Tax Department, There is No FIR and Hence No Police Station Involved, Court of ACJM (Economic Offence), Jodhpur, There is no Case No. as the Procedure is that Till Cognizance is Taken By the Magistrate, No Case Number is Assigned. The Complaint is Filed under Section 276C(1) and 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Appeal Filled Yes In Pending Write Petition 7095/14 Filed by the Undersigned in September, 2014 an Application for Stay, SB Civil Miscl Stay Vide Application No. 845/2021 was Moved by the Undersigned Against The Complaint in the Case Mentioned at S.No. 5(ii)(b) Above and That Application is Pending at The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, Prosecution complaint filed before court of Ld. Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offence) Jodhpur moved on 04-01-2021, no notice has been issued to the undersigned. These deails were discovered by the undersigned pursuant to additional affidavit on behalf on CBDT served on undersigned on 07-01-2021 in WP 1176/20 at Delhi High Court. |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.