Self Profession:CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT IN PRACTICE
Spouse Profession:HOUSE WIFE
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 26,70,717 ~ 26 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 18,95,918 ~ 18 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | Y | 2015 - 2016 | Rs 1,26,000 ~ 1 Lacs+ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | 120B, 409, 420, 468 | CASE NO. C.C.NO.8 OF 2012 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 27-04-2012 | |
2 | 120B, 420, 468, 471 | SEC.9 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.9 OF 2012 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 29-05-2012, 26-07-2013 | |
3 | 120B, 409, 420, 468 | CASE NO. C.C.NO.10 OF 2012 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 30-05-2012 | |
4 | 120B, 420, 468 | CASE NO. C.C.NO.14 OF 2012 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 13-09-2012 | |
5 | 120B, 420 | CASE NO. C.C.NO.12 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 13-05-2013 | |
6 | 120B, 420 | SEC.9 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.24 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 25-09-2013 | |
7 | 120B, 420 | SEC.13(2),13(1)(D) OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.25 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 28-09-2013 | |
8 | 120B, 420 | SEC.9 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.26 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 30-09-2013 | |
9 | 120B, 420 | SEC.9 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.27 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 10-10-2013 | |
10 | 120B, 420, 468, 471, 477A | SEC.9 OF PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT 1988, CASE NO. C.C.NO.28 OF 2013 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 17-10-2013 | |
11 | 120B, 420, 468 | CASE NO. C.C.NO.26 OF 2014 IN R.C.NO.19A OF 2011-CBI/HYD , COGNIZANCE COURT- THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, RED HILLS, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE DATE - 21-11-2014 | |
12 | SECTION-3&4 8(5) OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT, CASE NO- CC No-26 OF 2014 IN R.C. No- 19(A) OF 2011 CBI/HYD, SC NO 106 OF 2015 IN E.C.I.R. NO 09/HZO/2011 OF DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT HYD, COURT- THE PRINCIPAL SPL. JUDGE FOR CBI CASE RED HILLS NAMPLLY HYDERABAD, COGNIZANCE ON- 21.11.2014 | ||
13 | SECTION- 3&4 8(5) OF PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT CASE NO- S.C.NO 92 OF 2016 IN E.C.I.R. NO 09/HZO/2011 OF DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT HYD. COURT- THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE NAMPALLY HYD. DT OF COGNIZANCE- 18.02.2016 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.