Self Profession:Receiving pension
Spouse Profession:Business
Other Elections | ||
---|---|---|
Declaration in | Declared Assets | Declared Cases |
Tamil Nadu 2021 | Rs12,26,92,317 ~12 Crore+ | 6 |
Tamil Nadu 2016 | Rs10,77,82,473 ~10 Crore+ | 2 |
Click here for more details |
Relation Type | PAN Given | Financial Year | Total Income Shown in ITR |
---|---|---|---|
self | Y | 2016 - 2017 | Rs 3,45,840 ~ 3 Lacs+ |
spouse | Y | 2016 - 2017 | Rs 60,00,760 ~ 60 Lacs+ |
dependent1 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent2 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
dependent3 | N | None | Rs 0 ~ |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | Section 8(1), 9(1(A), 14 and Section 56(1)(i) of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, Enforcement Directorate, Shastri Bhavan, Haddows Road, Chennai 600086, Tamil Nadu. CC No. 27/1996, Cognizance Court & Framed Court The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, EO II, Egmore, Chennai, Framed Date 01.08.2017 | ||
2 | Section 8(1), 9(1)(A) and 56(1)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, read with Sec. 49(3) and (4) of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, Enforcement Directorate, Shastri Bhavan, Haddows Road, Chennai 600086, Tamil Nadu. CC No. 84/2011, Cognizance Court & Framed Court The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, EO II, Egmore, Chennai, Framed Date 08.06.2017 |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
1 | Supreme Court, Crl. Appeal 1843/2012, 1844/2012 and 1845/2012 (Gist of Cases: M.P. No. 2330 of 2004 in C.C. No. 81 of 2001, M.P. No. 2331 of 2004 in C.C. No. 82 of 2001 and M.P. No. 2332 of 2004 in C.C. No. 83 of 2001 was filed by TTV Dhinakaran to discharge By order dated 01.07.2005, the learned Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate passed an order discharging TTV Dhinakaran in all the three cases. Being aggrieved against that the Enforcement Directorate filed Crl. Rev. No. 811, 812 and 813 of 2005. By order dated 03.12.2010, the Hon'ble High Court dismissed all the three Revision Petitions by confirming the order of the Enforcement Directorate filed Criminal Appeal Nos. 1843, 1844 and 1845 of 2012 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and the same is pending) | ||
2 | 170, 120B | Sec. 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, PS Crime Branch, New Delhi/Special Judge VII, PC Act cases of ACB, GNCTD, Central District, THC, Delhi-FIR No. 56/2017 (Gist of Case: One Sukesh @ Sukesh Chandrasekar is in constant touch with TTV Dhinakaran regarding a pending matter before the Election Commission of India for dispute over the Party Symbol and the Said Sukesh had Promised to use his influence in the ECI to get the Matter resolved in favour of Sasikala faction and the said Sukesh was falsely impersonating as a member of Parliament and in conspiracy with TTV Dhinakaran, is trying to obtain a favourable order i ECI. Therefore, this case was registered) | |
3 | 294(b), 153, 506(1), 109 | Judicial Magistrate No. V Court, Tiruchirapalli - FIR No. 43/2017, dt. 31.08.2017 (Gist: One Mr. B. Kumar Filed a Complaint stating that one Senthil (Comedy Actor) gae a press statement near to TTV Dhinakaran's residence on instigation from TTV Dhinakaran, making allegation against me by using unparliamentary words which was telecasted in Polimer TV. Therefore, he made a complaint against Senthil, Comedy Actor and TTV Dhinakaran.) | |
4 | 143, 120(b), 124(a), 153, 500, 504, 506(2) | Annadanapatti Police Station, Salem City FIR No. 529/2017 dt. 29.09.2017 (Gist: One Saravanan made a complaint making allegations that certain person are distributing pamphlets in which statement have been made by instigating people to create problem against the State and Central Government and also making allegations against the Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Chief minister and Prime Minister. The Said Allegations was made against the named person, that TTV Dhinakaran was included as 14th Accused) | |
5 | 143, 188 | Sec. 123 of Motor Vehicles Act. 1998, Kalayar Koil Station, Sivagangai FIR No. 463/2017 dt. 27.10.2017 (One Karthikeyan files a complaint stating that TTV Dhinakaran along with his supporters came in number of cars to pay tribute of Marudapandiar Guru Poojai when order was in existence under Sec. 144, therefore, he made a complaint for violation of the order under Sec. 144) |
Serial No. | IPC Sections Applicable | Other Details / Other Acts / Sections Applicable | |
---------No Cases-------- |
Disclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Criminal Cases :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Movable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Immovable Assets :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: This information is an archive of the candidate's self-declared affidavit that was filed during the elections. The current status of this information may be different. For the latest available information, please refer to the affidavit filed by the candidate to the Election Commission in the most recent election.
Data Readability Report of Liabilities :No Problems in Reading Affidavit InformationDisclaimer: The primary source for the data used for these reports is the sworn affidavits provided by the candidates themselves. Sheer volume of data that has to be read from the affidavits that are often poorly scanned and the lightening speed at which these reports have to be brought out makes it quite difficult to ensure accuracy of every bit of data. In case of any discrepancy in our reports vis a vis the original affidavit of any candidate, the original affidavit should be considered accurate. If you notice any discrepancies between affidavit and our report kindly let us know and we will fix them on our end as soon as possible.